Review





Similar Products

99
ATCC m1 macrophage 573 thp 1 monocytes
M1 Macrophage 573 Thp 1 Monocytes, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/m1+macrophages/THP-1/pm41951047-286-6-11
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
m1 macrophage 573 thp 1 monocytes - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
MedChemExpress m1 macrophages
Spatial heterogeneity of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Immunophenotypic profiling across invasion states: Non-invaded pseudocapsule (n=9; pathologically tumor-free), tumor-invaded pseudocapsule (n=23), control dura mater from non-invasive tumor cases (n=10), tumor-invaded dura mater (n=21), tumor-invaded mucosa (n=10) and non-invaded mucosa (n=53). (A) Representative immunohistochemistry images for the detection of <t>macrophages</t> (IBA-1 + ), CD4 + T cells, CD8 + T cells and CD19 + B cells. Arrows indicate CD19-positive cells. (B) Quantification of macrophage burden (IBA-1 + immunoreactive area; %). (C) Quantification of CD4 + T-cell density (cells per HPF). (D) Quantification of CD8 + T-cell density (cells per HPF). (E-J) Spatial heterogeneity of macrophage phenotypes. (E) Multiplex immunofluorescence images showing IBA-1 + (red), HLA-DR + (green; <t>M1-like)</t> and CD206 + (magenta; M2-like) macrophage distributions at the IF of the pseudocapsule, dura mater and mucosa, and in non-invaded mucosa. (F) Grayscale-intensity distributions for IBA-1 quantified using ImageJ. (G) M1 immunoreactive area (% of microscopic field) in each group (TIM, TIM-IF, TIDM, TIDM-IF, TIP and TIP-IF). (H) M2 immunoreactive area (% of microscopic field) in each group (TIM, TIM-IF, TIDM, TIDM-IF, TIP and TIP-IF). (I) M1 immunoreactive area (% of microscopic field) in the TIM and NIM groups. (J) M2 immunoreactive area (% of microscopic field) in the TIM and NIM groups. (B-D) Kruskal-Wallis test with prespecified Dunn's post hoc planned comparisons (NIM vs. TIM/NIP/TIP/NIDM/TIDM) and Bonferroni correction. (G and H) Unpaired comparisons among TIM, TIDM and TIP, and separately among TIM-IF, TIDM-IF and TIP-IF, were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's multiple-comparisons test, whereas paired comparisons between each tumor region and its matched IF region were performed using the two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Bonferroni correction was applied across all nine comparisons performed in this analysis. (I and J) Unpaired comparisons were analyzed using a two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001. HPF, high-power field; IBA-1, ionised calcium binding adaptor molecule 1; IF, invasive front; NIDM, non-invaded dura mater; NIM, non-invaded mucosa; NIP, non-invaded pseudocapsule; ns, not significant; TIDM, tumor-invaded dura mater; TIM, tumor-invaded mucosa; TIP, tumor-invaded pseudocapsule.
M1 Macrophages, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/m1+macrophages/Lipopolysaccharides%2C+from+E%2E+coli+O55%3AB5/pmc13107097-93-45-56
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
m1 macrophages - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
PromoCell m1 macrophage generation medium dxf
Spatial heterogeneity of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Immunophenotypic profiling across invasion states: Non-invaded pseudocapsule (n=9; pathologically tumor-free), tumor-invaded pseudocapsule (n=23), control dura mater from non-invasive tumor cases (n=10), tumor-invaded dura mater (n=21), tumor-invaded mucosa (n=10) and non-invaded mucosa (n=53). (A) Representative immunohistochemistry images for the detection of <t>macrophages</t> (IBA-1 + ), CD4 + T cells, CD8 + T cells and CD19 + B cells. Arrows indicate CD19-positive cells. (B) Quantification of macrophage burden (IBA-1 + immunoreactive area; %). (C) Quantification of CD4 + T-cell density (cells per HPF). (D) Quantification of CD8 + T-cell density (cells per HPF). (E-J) Spatial heterogeneity of macrophage phenotypes. (E) Multiplex immunofluorescence images showing IBA-1 + (red), HLA-DR + (green; <t>M1-like)</t> and CD206 + (magenta; M2-like) macrophage distributions at the IF of the pseudocapsule, dura mater and mucosa, and in non-invaded mucosa. (F) Grayscale-intensity distributions for IBA-1 quantified using ImageJ. (G) M1 immunoreactive area (% of microscopic field) in each group (TIM, TIM-IF, TIDM, TIDM-IF, TIP and TIP-IF). (H) M2 immunoreactive area (% of microscopic field) in each group (TIM, TIM-IF, TIDM, TIDM-IF, TIP and TIP-IF). (I) M1 immunoreactive area (% of microscopic field) in the TIM and NIM groups. (J) M2 immunoreactive area (% of microscopic field) in the TIM and NIM groups. (B-D) Kruskal-Wallis test with prespecified Dunn's post hoc planned comparisons (NIM vs. TIM/NIP/TIP/NIDM/TIDM) and Bonferroni correction. (G and H) Unpaired comparisons among TIM, TIDM and TIP, and separately among TIM-IF, TIDM-IF and TIP-IF, were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's multiple-comparisons test, whereas paired comparisons between each tumor region and its matched IF region were performed using the two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Bonferroni correction was applied across all nine comparisons performed in this analysis. (I and J) Unpaired comparisons were analyzed using a two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001. HPF, high-power field; IBA-1, ionised calcium binding adaptor molecule 1; IF, invasive front; NIDM, non-invaded dura mater; NIM, non-invaded mucosa; NIP, non-invaded pseudocapsule; ns, not significant; TIDM, tumor-invaded dura mater; TIM, tumor-invaded mucosa; TIP, tumor-invaded pseudocapsule.
M1 Macrophage Generation Medium Dxf, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/m1+macrophages/M1-Macrophage+Generation+Medium+XF/pm41827829-264-28-33
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
m1 macrophage generation medium dxf - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Mimetics apoa1 mimetics m2 m1 macrophage repolarization
Spatial heterogeneity of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Immunophenotypic profiling across invasion states: Non-invaded pseudocapsule (n=9; pathologically tumor-free), tumor-invaded pseudocapsule (n=23), control dura mater from non-invasive tumor cases (n=10), tumor-invaded dura mater (n=21), tumor-invaded mucosa (n=10) and non-invaded mucosa (n=53). (A) Representative immunohistochemistry images for the detection of <t>macrophages</t> (IBA-1 + ), CD4 + T cells, CD8 + T cells and CD19 + B cells. Arrows indicate CD19-positive cells. (B) Quantification of macrophage burden (IBA-1 + immunoreactive area; %). (C) Quantification of CD4 + T-cell density (cells per HPF). (D) Quantification of CD8 + T-cell density (cells per HPF). (E-J) Spatial heterogeneity of macrophage phenotypes. (E) Multiplex immunofluorescence images showing IBA-1 + (red), HLA-DR + (green; <t>M1-like)</t> and CD206 + (magenta; M2-like) macrophage distributions at the IF of the pseudocapsule, dura mater and mucosa, and in non-invaded mucosa. (F) Grayscale-intensity distributions for IBA-1 quantified using ImageJ. (G) M1 immunoreactive area (% of microscopic field) in each group (TIM, TIM-IF, TIDM, TIDM-IF, TIP and TIP-IF). (H) M2 immunoreactive area (% of microscopic field) in each group (TIM, TIM-IF, TIDM, TIDM-IF, TIP and TIP-IF). (I) M1 immunoreactive area (% of microscopic field) in the TIM and NIM groups. (J) M2 immunoreactive area (% of microscopic field) in the TIM and NIM groups. (B-D) Kruskal-Wallis test with prespecified Dunn's post hoc planned comparisons (NIM vs. TIM/NIP/TIP/NIDM/TIDM) and Bonferroni correction. (G and H) Unpaired comparisons among TIM, TIDM and TIP, and separately among TIM-IF, TIDM-IF and TIP-IF, were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's multiple-comparisons test, whereas paired comparisons between each tumor region and its matched IF region were performed using the two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Bonferroni correction was applied across all nine comparisons performed in this analysis. (I and J) Unpaired comparisons were analyzed using a two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001. HPF, high-power field; IBA-1, ionised calcium binding adaptor molecule 1; IF, invasive front; NIDM, non-invaded dura mater; NIM, non-invaded mucosa; NIP, non-invaded pseudocapsule; ns, not significant; TIDM, tumor-invaded dura mater; TIM, tumor-invaded mucosa; TIP, tumor-invaded pseudocapsule.
Apoa1 Mimetics M2 M1 Macrophage Repolarization, supplied by Mimetics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/m1+macrophages/apoa+i+mimetics/pmc13039540-153-0-1
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
apoa1 mimetics m2 m1 macrophage repolarization - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Nikon macrophage subtypes
TRPV1 activation leads to a difference in <t>macrophage</t> infiltration with a remarkable increase of M1 and a decrease of M2 in number in vivo. A Representative immunofluorescence images of F4/80 after treatment with CAP and CPZ in CTX-induced muscle tissue at 4d. B The percentage of F4/80-positive cells between four groups at 4d post-injury ( n = 5 animals per experimental group; mean ± SD; One-way ANOVA). C , D Representative immunofluorescence images showed the relative fluorescence intensity of TRPV1 in these F4/80 + macrophages in each group ( n = 5 animals per experimental group; mean ± SD; One-way ANOVA). E , F Representative immunofluorescence images showed the infiltration of numbers of M1 (F4/80 + and <t>CD86+)</t> and M2 (F4/80 + and <t>CD206+)</t> macrophages in different groups at different intervals. G , H The proportion of M1 (F4/80 + and CD86+) macrophages and M2 macrophages (F4/80 + and CD206+) between four groups at 2-8days post-injury ( n = 5 animals per experimental group; mean ± SD; Two-way ANOVA). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001. Scale bar, 50 μm
Macrophage Subtypes, supplied by Nikon, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/m1+macrophages/MM-200/pmc12958662-70-0-33
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
macrophage subtypes - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
PromoCell m1 macrophage generation medium xf
TRPV1 activation leads to a difference in <t>macrophage</t> infiltration with a remarkable increase of M1 and a decrease of M2 in number in vivo. A Representative immunofluorescence images of F4/80 after treatment with CAP and CPZ in CTX-induced muscle tissue at 4d. B The percentage of F4/80-positive cells between four groups at 4d post-injury ( n = 5 animals per experimental group; mean ± SD; One-way ANOVA). C , D Representative immunofluorescence images showed the relative fluorescence intensity of TRPV1 in these F4/80 + macrophages in each group ( n = 5 animals per experimental group; mean ± SD; One-way ANOVA). E , F Representative immunofluorescence images showed the infiltration of numbers of M1 (F4/80 + and <t>CD86+)</t> and M2 (F4/80 + and <t>CD206+)</t> macrophages in different groups at different intervals. G , H The proportion of M1 (F4/80 + and CD86+) macrophages and M2 macrophages (F4/80 + and CD206+) between four groups at 2-8days post-injury ( n = 5 animals per experimental group; mean ± SD; Two-way ANOVA). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001. Scale bar, 50 μm
M1 Macrophage Generation Medium Xf, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/m1+macrophages/M1-Macrophage+Generation+Medium+XF/pmc12670911-33-16-20
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
m1 macrophage generation medium xf - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
PromoCell m1 macrophages
TRPV1 activation leads to a difference in <t>macrophage</t> infiltration with a remarkable increase of M1 and a decrease of M2 in number in vivo. A Representative immunofluorescence images of F4/80 after treatment with CAP and CPZ in CTX-induced muscle tissue at 4d. B The percentage of F4/80-positive cells between four groups at 4d post-injury ( n = 5 animals per experimental group; mean ± SD; One-way ANOVA). C , D Representative immunofluorescence images showed the relative fluorescence intensity of TRPV1 in these F4/80 + macrophages in each group ( n = 5 animals per experimental group; mean ± SD; One-way ANOVA). E , F Representative immunofluorescence images showed the infiltration of numbers of M1 (F4/80 + and <t>CD86+)</t> and M2 (F4/80 + and <t>CD206+)</t> macrophages in different groups at different intervals. G , H The proportion of M1 (F4/80 + and CD86+) macrophages and M2 macrophages (F4/80 + and CD206+) between four groups at 2-8days post-injury ( n = 5 animals per experimental group; mean ± SD; Two-way ANOVA). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001. Scale bar, 50 μm
M1 Macrophages, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/m1+macrophages/M1-Macrophage+Generation+Medium+XF/pmc12670911-33-6-13
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
m1 macrophages - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Spatial heterogeneity of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Immunophenotypic profiling across invasion states: Non-invaded pseudocapsule (n=9; pathologically tumor-free), tumor-invaded pseudocapsule (n=23), control dura mater from non-invasive tumor cases (n=10), tumor-invaded dura mater (n=21), tumor-invaded mucosa (n=10) and non-invaded mucosa (n=53). (A) Representative immunohistochemistry images for the detection of macrophages (IBA-1 + ), CD4 + T cells, CD8 + T cells and CD19 + B cells. Arrows indicate CD19-positive cells. (B) Quantification of macrophage burden (IBA-1 + immunoreactive area; %). (C) Quantification of CD4 + T-cell density (cells per HPF). (D) Quantification of CD8 + T-cell density (cells per HPF). (E-J) Spatial heterogeneity of macrophage phenotypes. (E) Multiplex immunofluorescence images showing IBA-1 + (red), HLA-DR + (green; M1-like) and CD206 + (magenta; M2-like) macrophage distributions at the IF of the pseudocapsule, dura mater and mucosa, and in non-invaded mucosa. (F) Grayscale-intensity distributions for IBA-1 quantified using ImageJ. (G) M1 immunoreactive area (% of microscopic field) in each group (TIM, TIM-IF, TIDM, TIDM-IF, TIP and TIP-IF). (H) M2 immunoreactive area (% of microscopic field) in each group (TIM, TIM-IF, TIDM, TIDM-IF, TIP and TIP-IF). (I) M1 immunoreactive area (% of microscopic field) in the TIM and NIM groups. (J) M2 immunoreactive area (% of microscopic field) in the TIM and NIM groups. (B-D) Kruskal-Wallis test with prespecified Dunn's post hoc planned comparisons (NIM vs. TIM/NIP/TIP/NIDM/TIDM) and Bonferroni correction. (G and H) Unpaired comparisons among TIM, TIDM and TIP, and separately among TIM-IF, TIDM-IF and TIP-IF, were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's multiple-comparisons test, whereas paired comparisons between each tumor region and its matched IF region were performed using the two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Bonferroni correction was applied across all nine comparisons performed in this analysis. (I and J) Unpaired comparisons were analyzed using a two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001. HPF, high-power field; IBA-1, ionised calcium binding adaptor molecule 1; IF, invasive front; NIDM, non-invaded dura mater; NIM, non-invaded mucosa; NIP, non-invaded pseudocapsule; ns, not significant; TIDM, tumor-invaded dura mater; TIM, tumor-invaded mucosa; TIP, tumor-invaded pseudocapsule.

Journal: Molecular Medicine Reports

Article Title: Elevated IgG levels induce an M2-to-M1 phenotypic shift in mucosal macrophages and restrict the growth of invasive sphenoid sinus pituitary adenomas

doi: 10.3892/mmr.2026.13878

Figure Lengend Snippet: Spatial heterogeneity of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Immunophenotypic profiling across invasion states: Non-invaded pseudocapsule (n=9; pathologically tumor-free), tumor-invaded pseudocapsule (n=23), control dura mater from non-invasive tumor cases (n=10), tumor-invaded dura mater (n=21), tumor-invaded mucosa (n=10) and non-invaded mucosa (n=53). (A) Representative immunohistochemistry images for the detection of macrophages (IBA-1 + ), CD4 + T cells, CD8 + T cells and CD19 + B cells. Arrows indicate CD19-positive cells. (B) Quantification of macrophage burden (IBA-1 + immunoreactive area; %). (C) Quantification of CD4 + T-cell density (cells per HPF). (D) Quantification of CD8 + T-cell density (cells per HPF). (E-J) Spatial heterogeneity of macrophage phenotypes. (E) Multiplex immunofluorescence images showing IBA-1 + (red), HLA-DR + (green; M1-like) and CD206 + (magenta; M2-like) macrophage distributions at the IF of the pseudocapsule, dura mater and mucosa, and in non-invaded mucosa. (F) Grayscale-intensity distributions for IBA-1 quantified using ImageJ. (G) M1 immunoreactive area (% of microscopic field) in each group (TIM, TIM-IF, TIDM, TIDM-IF, TIP and TIP-IF). (H) M2 immunoreactive area (% of microscopic field) in each group (TIM, TIM-IF, TIDM, TIDM-IF, TIP and TIP-IF). (I) M1 immunoreactive area (% of microscopic field) in the TIM and NIM groups. (J) M2 immunoreactive area (% of microscopic field) in the TIM and NIM groups. (B-D) Kruskal-Wallis test with prespecified Dunn's post hoc planned comparisons (NIM vs. TIM/NIP/TIP/NIDM/TIDM) and Bonferroni correction. (G and H) Unpaired comparisons among TIM, TIDM and TIP, and separately among TIM-IF, TIDM-IF and TIP-IF, were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's multiple-comparisons test, whereas paired comparisons between each tumor region and its matched IF region were performed using the two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Bonferroni correction was applied across all nine comparisons performed in this analysis. (I and J) Unpaired comparisons were analyzed using a two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001. HPF, high-power field; IBA-1, ionised calcium binding adaptor molecule 1; IF, invasive front; NIDM, non-invaded dura mater; NIM, non-invaded mucosa; NIP, non-invaded pseudocapsule; ns, not significant; TIDM, tumor-invaded dura mater; TIM, tumor-invaded mucosa; TIP, tumor-invaded pseudocapsule.

Article Snippet: RAW264.7 macrophages in the M0, M1 or M2 state were treated with IgG (10 μg/ml; cat. no. 14-4714-85; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) or anti-CD47 monoclonal antibody (mAb) (10 μg/ml; cat. no. 16-0479-85; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 37°C for 12 h. For polarization, M1 macrophages were induced with lipopolysaccharide (100 ng/ml; cat. no. HY-D1056; MedChemExpress) plus IFN-γ (20 ng/ml; cat. no. RP01070; ABclonal Biotech Co., Ltd.) for 24 h at 37°C, whereas M2 macrophages were induced with IL-4 (20 ng/ml; cat. no. RP01161; ABclonal Biotech Co., Ltd.) for 24 h at 37°C.

Techniques: Control, Immunohistochemistry, Multiplex Assay, Immunofluorescence, Two Tailed Test, MANN-WHITNEY, Binding Assay

Elevated IgG levels drive macrophage M2-to-M1 reprogramming. (A) Sphenoid sinus-invasive tumor cases stratified into CD19-high (n=5) and CD19-low (n=5) groups based on the cohort median of CD19 + B cell density, with (B) quantitative analyses of macrophage polarization (M1-like versus M2-like). (C) Dural-invasive tumor and non-invasive tumor cases stratified into IgG-high (n=27) and IgG-low (n=26) groups based on the cohort median of relative IgG immunohistochemistry staining intensity, with (D) quantitative analyses of M1-like/M2-like macrophage proportions. (E and F) RAW264.7 macrophages were pre-polarized with IL-4 (20 ng/ml) or with lipopolysaccharide (100 ng/ml) plus IFN-γ (20 ng/ml) for 24 h, followed by IgG (10 µg/ml) exposure. Relative (E) IL-6 and (F) TNF-α mRNA expression in RAW264.7 macrophages pre-polarized to M0, M1 or M2 states. (G) Representative flow cytometric cell-cycle profiles of TtT/GF cells following the indicated treatments. (H) Stacked bar plot summarizing the percentages of cells from (G) in G 1 , S and G 2 /M phases. (I) Representative images from the scratch wound assay at 0, 24, 48 and 72 h under the indicated treatments. (J) Quantification of scratch wound closure. (K) Representative western blot images showing total STAT1, p-STAT1, total STAT3, p-STAT3 and β-actin levels in cells treated with IFN-γ (100 ng/ml), IL-6 (100 ng/ml), IFN-γ + IL-6 (50 ng/ml each), ruxolitinib (5 µM) or IFN-γ + IL-6 (50 ng/ml each) plus ruxolitinib (5 µM), as indicated. (L) Densitometric semi-quantification of p-STAT1/STAT1 (ratio). (B and D) Unpaired two-tailed Student's t-test. (E, F, J and L) One-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc multiple comparisons test. *P<0.05, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001. CTRL, control; IBA-1, ionised calcium binding adaptor molecule 1; ns, not significant; p-, phosphorylated; PE-A, phycoerythrin-area.

Journal: Molecular Medicine Reports

Article Title: Elevated IgG levels induce an M2-to-M1 phenotypic shift in mucosal macrophages and restrict the growth of invasive sphenoid sinus pituitary adenomas

doi: 10.3892/mmr.2026.13878

Figure Lengend Snippet: Elevated IgG levels drive macrophage M2-to-M1 reprogramming. (A) Sphenoid sinus-invasive tumor cases stratified into CD19-high (n=5) and CD19-low (n=5) groups based on the cohort median of CD19 + B cell density, with (B) quantitative analyses of macrophage polarization (M1-like versus M2-like). (C) Dural-invasive tumor and non-invasive tumor cases stratified into IgG-high (n=27) and IgG-low (n=26) groups based on the cohort median of relative IgG immunohistochemistry staining intensity, with (D) quantitative analyses of M1-like/M2-like macrophage proportions. (E and F) RAW264.7 macrophages were pre-polarized with IL-4 (20 ng/ml) or with lipopolysaccharide (100 ng/ml) plus IFN-γ (20 ng/ml) for 24 h, followed by IgG (10 µg/ml) exposure. Relative (E) IL-6 and (F) TNF-α mRNA expression in RAW264.7 macrophages pre-polarized to M0, M1 or M2 states. (G) Representative flow cytometric cell-cycle profiles of TtT/GF cells following the indicated treatments. (H) Stacked bar plot summarizing the percentages of cells from (G) in G 1 , S and G 2 /M phases. (I) Representative images from the scratch wound assay at 0, 24, 48 and 72 h under the indicated treatments. (J) Quantification of scratch wound closure. (K) Representative western blot images showing total STAT1, p-STAT1, total STAT3, p-STAT3 and β-actin levels in cells treated with IFN-γ (100 ng/ml), IL-6 (100 ng/ml), IFN-γ + IL-6 (50 ng/ml each), ruxolitinib (5 µM) or IFN-γ + IL-6 (50 ng/ml each) plus ruxolitinib (5 µM), as indicated. (L) Densitometric semi-quantification of p-STAT1/STAT1 (ratio). (B and D) Unpaired two-tailed Student's t-test. (E, F, J and L) One-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc multiple comparisons test. *P<0.05, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001. CTRL, control; IBA-1, ionised calcium binding adaptor molecule 1; ns, not significant; p-, phosphorylated; PE-A, phycoerythrin-area.

Article Snippet: RAW264.7 macrophages in the M0, M1 or M2 state were treated with IgG (10 μg/ml; cat. no. 14-4714-85; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) or anti-CD47 monoclonal antibody (mAb) (10 μg/ml; cat. no. 16-0479-85; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 37°C for 12 h. For polarization, M1 macrophages were induced with lipopolysaccharide (100 ng/ml; cat. no. HY-D1056; MedChemExpress) plus IFN-γ (20 ng/ml; cat. no. RP01070; ABclonal Biotech Co., Ltd.) for 24 h at 37°C, whereas M2 macrophages were induced with IL-4 (20 ng/ml; cat. no. RP01161; ABclonal Biotech Co., Ltd.) for 24 h at 37°C.

Techniques: Immunohistochemistry, Staining, Expressing, Scratch Wound Assay Assay, Western Blot, Two Tailed Test, Control, Binding Assay

Summary graphic illustration. This illustration summarizes the proposed model during pituitary adenoma invasion. The tumor invasive front abuts an intact sphenoid sinus mucosa, forming a distinct boundary. The mucosal compartment is enriched for ionised calcium binding adaptor molecule 1-positive macrophages with an M1-like predominance and IgG-high B cells. B cell-derived IgG promotes M2-to-M1 macrophage reprogramming, while coordinated IFN-γ and IL-6 production establishes a tumor-suppressive cytokine gradient that decreases from mucosa toward the tumor core, constraining proliferation and migration via JAK-STAT1 activation. Therapeutically, anti-CD47 monoclonal antibody blocks the CD47-SIRPα ‘don't-eat-me’ axis and augments antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis, highlighting a strategy for immune checkpoint-targeted therapy that may complement surgical management. FcR, Fc receptor; JAK, Janus kinase; mAb, monoclonal antibody; p-, phosphorylated; SIRPα, signal regulatory protein-α.

Journal: Molecular Medicine Reports

Article Title: Elevated IgG levels induce an M2-to-M1 phenotypic shift in mucosal macrophages and restrict the growth of invasive sphenoid sinus pituitary adenomas

doi: 10.3892/mmr.2026.13878

Figure Lengend Snippet: Summary graphic illustration. This illustration summarizes the proposed model during pituitary adenoma invasion. The tumor invasive front abuts an intact sphenoid sinus mucosa, forming a distinct boundary. The mucosal compartment is enriched for ionised calcium binding adaptor molecule 1-positive macrophages with an M1-like predominance and IgG-high B cells. B cell-derived IgG promotes M2-to-M1 macrophage reprogramming, while coordinated IFN-γ and IL-6 production establishes a tumor-suppressive cytokine gradient that decreases from mucosa toward the tumor core, constraining proliferation and migration via JAK-STAT1 activation. Therapeutically, anti-CD47 monoclonal antibody blocks the CD47-SIRPα ‘don't-eat-me’ axis and augments antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis, highlighting a strategy for immune checkpoint-targeted therapy that may complement surgical management. FcR, Fc receptor; JAK, Janus kinase; mAb, monoclonal antibody; p-, phosphorylated; SIRPα, signal regulatory protein-α.

Article Snippet: RAW264.7 macrophages in the M0, M1 or M2 state were treated with IgG (10 μg/ml; cat. no. 14-4714-85; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) or anti-CD47 monoclonal antibody (mAb) (10 μg/ml; cat. no. 16-0479-85; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 37°C for 12 h. For polarization, M1 macrophages were induced with lipopolysaccharide (100 ng/ml; cat. no. HY-D1056; MedChemExpress) plus IFN-γ (20 ng/ml; cat. no. RP01070; ABclonal Biotech Co., Ltd.) for 24 h at 37°C, whereas M2 macrophages were induced with IL-4 (20 ng/ml; cat. no. RP01161; ABclonal Biotech Co., Ltd.) for 24 h at 37°C.

Techniques: Binding Assay, Derivative Assay, Migration, Activation Assay

TRPV1 activation leads to a difference in macrophage infiltration with a remarkable increase of M1 and a decrease of M2 in number in vivo. A Representative immunofluorescence images of F4/80 after treatment with CAP and CPZ in CTX-induced muscle tissue at 4d. B The percentage of F4/80-positive cells between four groups at 4d post-injury ( n = 5 animals per experimental group; mean ± SD; One-way ANOVA). C , D Representative immunofluorescence images showed the relative fluorescence intensity of TRPV1 in these F4/80 + macrophages in each group ( n = 5 animals per experimental group; mean ± SD; One-way ANOVA). E , F Representative immunofluorescence images showed the infiltration of numbers of M1 (F4/80 + and CD86+) and M2 (F4/80 + and CD206+) macrophages in different groups at different intervals. G , H The proportion of M1 (F4/80 + and CD86+) macrophages and M2 macrophages (F4/80 + and CD206+) between four groups at 2-8days post-injury ( n = 5 animals per experimental group; mean ± SD; Two-way ANOVA). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001. Scale bar, 50 μm

Journal: Skeletal Muscle

Article Title: TRPV1 manipulating polarization of M1/M2 macrophages to promote skeletal muscle regeneration

doi: 10.1186/s13395-026-00417-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: TRPV1 activation leads to a difference in macrophage infiltration with a remarkable increase of M1 and a decrease of M2 in number in vivo. A Representative immunofluorescence images of F4/80 after treatment with CAP and CPZ in CTX-induced muscle tissue at 4d. B The percentage of F4/80-positive cells between four groups at 4d post-injury ( n = 5 animals per experimental group; mean ± SD; One-way ANOVA). C , D Representative immunofluorescence images showed the relative fluorescence intensity of TRPV1 in these F4/80 + macrophages in each group ( n = 5 animals per experimental group; mean ± SD; One-way ANOVA). E , F Representative immunofluorescence images showed the infiltration of numbers of M1 (F4/80 + and CD86+) and M2 (F4/80 + and CD206+) macrophages in different groups at different intervals. G , H The proportion of M1 (F4/80 + and CD86+) macrophages and M2 macrophages (F4/80 + and CD206+) between four groups at 2-8days post-injury ( n = 5 animals per experimental group; mean ± SD; Two-way ANOVA). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001. Scale bar, 50 μm

Article Snippet: Macrophage subtypes (M1: CD86-positive and F4/80-positive; M2: CD206-positive and F4/80-positive) were counted independently by two pathologists in five randomly selected non-overlapping fields per section at 400× magnification using a fluorescence microscopy (ECLIPSE Ti2, Nikon, Japan).

Techniques: Activation Assay, In Vivo, Immunofluorescence, Fluorescence

TRPV1 regulates M1/M2 macrophage polarization to promote myogenic differentiation in C2C12 cells. A C2C12 myoblasts were co-cultured with M1 or M2 macrophages for 4 days via a transwell cell culture insert. B Representative Western blot bands of MyoD and MYH3 in C2C12 myoblasts after being co-cultured with M1 or M2 macrophages for 4 days. C , D The protein expression of MyoD and MYH3 in those C2C12 myoblasts which were co-cultured with M1or M2 macrophages after CAP and CPZ treatment ( n = 3 independent replicates in cells; mean ± SD; Two-way ANOVA). E , F Representative immunofluorescence images showed myotubes fusion index in C2C12 cells ( n = 5 independent random fields of cells; mean ± SD; Two-way ANOVA). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001. Scale bar, 50 μm

Journal: Skeletal Muscle

Article Title: TRPV1 manipulating polarization of M1/M2 macrophages to promote skeletal muscle regeneration

doi: 10.1186/s13395-026-00417-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: TRPV1 regulates M1/M2 macrophage polarization to promote myogenic differentiation in C2C12 cells. A C2C12 myoblasts were co-cultured with M1 or M2 macrophages for 4 days via a transwell cell culture insert. B Representative Western blot bands of MyoD and MYH3 in C2C12 myoblasts after being co-cultured with M1 or M2 macrophages for 4 days. C , D The protein expression of MyoD and MYH3 in those C2C12 myoblasts which were co-cultured with M1or M2 macrophages after CAP and CPZ treatment ( n = 3 independent replicates in cells; mean ± SD; Two-way ANOVA). E , F Representative immunofluorescence images showed myotubes fusion index in C2C12 cells ( n = 5 independent random fields of cells; mean ± SD; Two-way ANOVA). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001. Scale bar, 50 μm

Article Snippet: Macrophage subtypes (M1: CD86-positive and F4/80-positive; M2: CD206-positive and F4/80-positive) were counted independently by two pathologists in five randomly selected non-overlapping fields per section at 400× magnification using a fluorescence microscopy (ECLIPSE Ti2, Nikon, Japan).

Techniques: Cell Characterization, Cell Culture, Western Blot, Expressing, Immunofluorescence